Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 3% better in Apex Legends than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 280 vs 272 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $7.99 vs $179.99
- Up to 95% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $0.03 vs $0.64 per FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
4%
Price, $
$179.99
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
272
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$7.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $7.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Renoir | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |