Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2739 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Celeron 1000M - 153 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Intel Celeron 1000M |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Renoir | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |