Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 51 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 15 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 45 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
