Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2408 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Core i3-3240T - 654 vs 600 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240T - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
600
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |