Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 3924 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 45% better in Minecraft than FX-6300 - 869 vs 600 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7500F - $58.04 vs $225.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 5 7500F - $0.16 vs $0.26 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
FPS
869
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
61.53846153846154%
Price, $
$225
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
600
69.04487917146145%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $58.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 22nd, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |