Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2713 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 201 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 5 5600X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 80 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
