Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G3900 - 216 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $19.0 vs $1199.99
- Up to 98% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 5600X - $0.1 vs $5.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for $19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |