Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2992 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-4130 - 251 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $22.92 vs $1199.99
- Up to 98% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 5600X - $0.1 vs $4.78 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |