Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 363 days older than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 124 vs 120 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$218
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $218 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14633 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |