Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 115 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Fortnite than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 229 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS - 16 vs 12 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2550 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |