Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2610 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 137 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 69 vs 95 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 69 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |