Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $185.0 vs $210.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3600X - $1.67 vs $1.69 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |