Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1496 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 279 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Matisse | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris Pro P6300 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |