Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1357 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 582 vs 546 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
582
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $83.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 80 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |