Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 915 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-7700T - 228 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $82.99 vs $150.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i7-7700T - $0.36 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $82.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3068 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |