Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2500 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron B830 - 236 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Celeron B830 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |