Buy on Amazon
$125
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9800X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 340 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9800X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-9800X - 218 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $125.0 vs $768.88
- Up to 84% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-9800X - $0.57 vs $3.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 16 vs 6 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 5 3500X
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD 100-100000158BOX RYZEN 5 3500X 6-Core 3.6 GHz (4.1 GHz Turbo) Socket AM4 65W Desktop Processor
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2014 minutes ago
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
217
99.54128440366972%
Value, $/FPS
$3.54/FPS
16.101694915254235%
Price, $
$768.88
16%
Intel Core i7-9800X X-Series Processor 8 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC3)
Buy for $768.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2013 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 5 3500X
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
|---|---|---|
Sep 24th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
