Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2135 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Core i7-4930K - 149 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $98.0 vs $124.79
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.67 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
79.76190476190477%
Price, $
$124.79
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $124.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2468 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
146
97.98657718120806%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
662
58.687943262411345%
Multi-Core
3336
92.18016026526665%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |