Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 1052 days older than Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600X - 172 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
170
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris Pro P6300 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |