Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2657 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2500K - 165 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $84.38 vs $449.95
- Up to 82% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2500K - $0.51 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $84.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4950 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
157
95.15151515151516%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
17.770034843205572%
Price, $
$449.95
18%
Buy for $449.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4944 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
52.22312045270816%
Multi-Core
1921
36.50009500285009%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |