Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 913 days older than Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 5 2600 - 253 vs 248 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
248
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 80 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |