Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3330 - 127 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $106.51 vs $155.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.91 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |