Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1145 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than Celeron 3205U - 171 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Celeron 3205U |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 15 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |