Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 1463 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 53 vs 52 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 24 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |