Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 39 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $106.47 vs $383.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900K - $0.59 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 193 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
181
93.78238341968913%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32518 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
29.797979797979796%
Price, $
$383
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $383 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32519 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
66.12709832134293%
Multi-Core
3801
47.75125628140703%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |