Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 441 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $106.47 vs $379.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-7820X - $0.59 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 187 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
181
96.79144385026738%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32753 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
29.064039408867%
Price, $
$379
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32752 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
78.17150956768249%
Multi-Core
3801
48.42655115301312%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |