Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 1835 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-4130 - 323 vs 308 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $41.0 vs $106.47
- Up to 61% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 2500X - $0.13 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
323
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
39.39393939393939%
Price, $
$106.47
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32856 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
308
95.3560371517028%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |