Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 917 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2500U - 113 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500U - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$249
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Single-Core
814
46.17129892229155%
Multi-Core
2330
25.453353725147476%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |