Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1896 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2500U - 123 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500U - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$884.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $884.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |