Buy on Amazon
$135
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 3079 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-860 - 172 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $98.95 vs $135.0
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
73%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor with Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics - YD2400C5FBBOX
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Intel OEM BV80605001908AK Core i7-860 Processor 2.8GHz 2.5GT/s 8MB LGA 1156 CPU OEM
Buy for $98.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
42.19489120151372%
Multi-Core
1463
44.414086217364904%
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
