Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1688 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $135.0 vs $268.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-13600K - $1.34 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 130 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
101
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3887 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
64%
Price, $
$268.99
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $268.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3886 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |