Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3900 - 168 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $39.9 vs $135.0
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77023 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77021 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
54.966887417218544%
Multi-Core
992
30.115361262902248%
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |