Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1729 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $125.0 vs $432.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-12900F - $0.68 vs $1.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 36% better in Rust than Ryzen 5 1600X - 248 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
183
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5012 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
38%
Price, $
$432.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |