Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 1190 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 1600X - 208 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 128 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1499
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
70.27534418022529%
Multi-Core
4766
32.14189371459401%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 64 |
12 | Threads | 128 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |