Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 1190 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 3% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen 5 1600X - 207 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 64 vs 12 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1525
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
67.85498489425981%
Multi-Core
4766
32.69085671170862%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |