Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 817 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 3200G - 54 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - $79.23 vs $125.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 5 1600X - $1.49 vs $2.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11576 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
53
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11578 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |