Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1631 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - 133 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than FX-8350 - $125.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - $0.94 vs $1.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |