Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $71.75 vs $225.99
- Up to 67% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-10700F - $0.44 vs $1.33 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 1500X - 170 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1500X - 16 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
163
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$71.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $71.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3416 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
33%
Price, $
$225.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |