Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is 1025 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
- Performs up to 2% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 166 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
