Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 879 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 205 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 64 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1675
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,675 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |