Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4100 is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4100
- Performs up to 34% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3930 - 184 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen 3 4100 - $63.92 vs $66.76
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $66.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77046 minutes ago
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
40.97035040431267%
Multi-Core
1043
22.182050191407914%
AMD Ryzen 3 4100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Not Available | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |