Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2175 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4460 - 193 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $64.04 vs $150.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.36 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7851 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
180
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |