Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 341 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 15 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 5% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 201 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 56 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 28 |
| 4 | Threads | 56 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 255 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
