Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 611 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 24% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 3250U - 149 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Single-Core
748
32.550043516100956%
Multi-Core
1447
14.480136095266689%
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Picasso | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
