Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 79 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 15 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Valorant than Ryzen 3 3250U - 795 vs 709 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 20 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Single-Core
748
47.46192893401015%
Multi-Core
1447
15.441254935439119%
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Picasso | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |