Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1619 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 15 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 243 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
243
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3309 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |