Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 363 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 3250U - 581 vs 478 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
581
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$180.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $180.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3013 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |