Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10300H outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10300H is 255 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i5-10300H - 15 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 3250U - 237 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-10300H |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 17th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
