Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1467 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 64% better in Rust than Ryzen 3 3200U - 276 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 32 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$589.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $589.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |