Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200U is 2443 days newer than Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-3770K - 385 vs 382 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 15 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
382
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4521 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |